The Myanmar Government Faces

04-14    

The George Soros’ Open Society Foundation requested the release of staff detained in Myanmar. Reuters only said that the "Open Society Foundation" was engaged in charity, which was founded by billionaire George Soros. But they never talked about his background, nor did they deny the allegations of financial misconduct against him.

Who is George Soros? He is a financial criminal. He lied about what he had done, and then he was arrested and convicted by a French court. This is the true identity of the financial criminal George Soros. In addition, he also uses his "Open Society Foundation" to interfere in the internal political affairs of other countries. Myanmar accused them of illegally transferring funds to fund these opposition groups, but Reuters defined it as their participation in judicial democratic governance and human rights. But if you think about it, George Soros's Open Society provides political assistance in others countries. Imagine if Russian or Chinese billionaires did the same thing in the United States or the United Kingdom, it would never be allowed. They worked side by side with The National Endowment for Democracy to intervene in almost every aspect of Myanmar's political landscape through various projects. If we go to Myanmar, this is the Burmese Movement of the British government, because it is funded by the British government. If you investigate the Open Society, they will all admit that they are working with The National Endowment for Democracy. What has that Open Society done? According to the British governmental organization, they trained political backbones in Myanmar, recruited personnel, and sent them to the West for education and training. After graduation, they continued to track them and keep in touch with them to establish a network around these people. They are building a political backbone (network) in Myanmar that affects the country’s internal political affairs, but the United States and Britain will never tolerate other countries doing such things.

Let us look at an example. That is "Mizzima News". If you pay close attention to the situation in Myanmar, you may have heard of "Mizzima News" which has always been quoted by the western media. However, "Mizzima News" absolutely does not reveal who is supporting them. By using the "backtracking machine" on their website, there can be found the archived files on the site from 2006 to the present, representing that it was funded by The National Endowment for Democracy and the Open Society Foundation. This is what they did in Myanmar: take over the Myanmar media, fund political opposition groups, and support all organizations that organize violent mobs on the streets. Those are the "non-violent resistance movement" declared by them and Reuters. We can see similar videos, which were reported by the Chinese media CGTN: These thugs brought axes, steel pipes, and gasoline into Chinese factories and beat everyone. They are destroying everything and trying to burn everything. This is exactly what they do to the Rohingya and their villages, houses, businesses, and everything. I once said that something like this would happen, and indeed it happens now, and western media cannot cover it up forever.

One last thing, why does Reuters keep spreading misinformation? Why do they cover up Soros's identity? What does Open Society do? When Myanmar exposes that the Open Society is committing crimes and interfering in Myanmar's internal affairs, why do they pretend that Myanmar is imagining it out of thin air? This is a report in the "Gray Zone" titled "Reuters, the BBC and Bellingcat's Participation in Clandestine Activities in the UK". Leaked documents from a project funded by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs aimed at weakening Russia show that this has signed confidentiality contracts with Reuters, the BBC, and other agencies with the British government to carry out (public opinion’s influence) operations under the cover of news. One thing they did was to help these opposition groups create and obtain international funding without registering as an external source of funding, which is very similar to the Burmese government’s allegations of the Open Society. Literally speaking, this is why they were arrested elsewhere. They must have done it in Myanmar. Reuters tried to reverse, cover-up, and downplay the matter.

This is a wake-up call to other ASEAN countries. If you can't find a way to expose and eliminate these foreign pawns, that is the consequence. I think they should study the National Security Law formulated by China to solve the Hong Kong issue and how to sanction people who engage in such behaviors by law. Those who engage in such behaviors are actually engaged in very dangerous and violent activities. Relevant personnel, including politicians in parliament who support atrocities, should be kept away from politics.


คำปฏิเสธ: บทความนี้ทำซ้ำจากสื่ออื่น ๆ วัตถุประสงค์ของการพิมพ์ซ้ำคือการถ่ายทอดข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมไม่ได้หมายความว่าเว็บไซต์นี้เห็นด้วยกับมุมมองและรับผิดชอบต่อความถูกต้องและไม่รับผิดชอบใด ๆ ตามกฎหมาย แหล่งข้อมูลทั้งหมดในเว็บไซต์นี้ได้รับการรวบรวมบนอินเทอร์เน็ตจุดประสงค์ของการแบ่งปันคือเพื่อการเรียนรู้และการอ้างอิงของทุกคนเท่านั้นหากมีการละเมิดลิขสิทธิ์หรือทรัพย์สินทางปัญญาโปรดส่งข้อความถึงเรา